12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon'ble the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph No.39 held thus:-"39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus reveals:

 — The organization of the federal judicial system, including the size of the Supreme Court, is established by Congress.From 1789 to 1807 the court comprised six justices.In 1807 a seventh justice was added, followed by an eighth and a ninth in 1837 and a tenth in 1863. The size of the court has sometimes been subject to political …

On 28.02.2018, sub-rule (4) of Rule 5 of the 2017 Rules was amended. By the said amendment, the time period of one year for fulfilment of the conditions of the LoIs, including execution and registration of mining lease, was extended to 13 months from the date of commencement of the 2017 Rules, failing which the rights of the applicants would stand

Order. 1. Mr M.C Mehta — environmentalist lawyer — has filed this public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Haryana Pollution Control Board (the Board) to control the pollution caused by the stone crushers, pulverisers and mine operators in the Faridabad-Balabgarh area.

 — Supreme Court Rules Sackler Family Can Still Be Held Liable for Opioid Epidemic The court rejected Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy settlement in a 5-4 vote By Catherina Gioino

 — In 1997, one Obayya Poojary filed a PIL regarding stone crushing units.The Karnataka high court on July 10,1998, issued certain directions to both the State Government and the KSPCB to evolve a ...

 — Aishwarya Rathore-Published On: September 21, 2021 at 16:30 IST. The Himachal Pradesh High Court issued Notices to the Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary (forest), State Pollution Control Board, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Kangra Deputy Commissioner, and Jwalamukhi Sub-divisional Magistrate in a case involving the …

38 L.Ed. 734. GATES IRON WORKS. v. FRASER et al. No. 253. May 14, 1894. This was a suit by the Gates Iron Works against David R. Fraser, Thomas Chalmers, and Hiram H. …

Supreme Court Civil Rules [Last amended March 6, 2024 by B.C. Reg. 28/2024] Contents; Part 1 — Interpretation: Rule 1-1 — Interpretation (1) Definitions (2) Interpretation Act and Supreme Court Act (3) Titles and headings (4) Reference aids: Rule 1-2 — Citation and Application (1) Citation (2) Application

The Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act No. 8 of 2012) kar017 (First published in the Karnataka Gazette Extra-ordinary on the fifth day of January, 2012) (Received the assent of the Governor on the third day of January, 2012) An Act to provide for the Regulation of Stone Crushers in the State of Karnataka.

 — On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...

 — Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Accessibility Amenities Museum Guided Tour FAQs Webcast India Code Pay Scales Telephone Directory Argument Transcripts Accounts Steps taken during COVID-19 ... Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India, Developed and hosted by National ...

 — CPCB's guidelines also include general measures for air pollution control to be followed in the stone crushing units. However, beyond what CSE had proposed, the CPCB guidelines talked about …

as per the mandate of aforesaid rules, no license to operate Stone crusher/Hot and Wet mixing plant, shall be granted to the licensing ... been framed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the

 — Over four decades after the legal question whether a rocky land used for quarrying could be considered a "commercial site" and hence exempted from land ceiling provisions under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 was first raised in a court of law, the Supreme Court, in a blow to unscrupulous quarrying interests in Kerala, ruled on …

Crushers (Installation, Operation and Regulations) Rules, 2020 ("Rules") to the extent they are ultra vires Sections 7 and 19 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Power Crushers (Installation, Operation and Regulations) Act, 2020 ("Act") as well as the fundamental rights i.e., Articles 9, 23, 24, and 25 of the Constitution.

 — LI Network. Published on: November 27, 2023 at 16:50 IST. The Allahabad High Court overturned an order of blacklisting and cancellation of a mining lease, stressing the importance of following principles of natural justice to uphold the rule of law in a civilized society.. The petitioner, who had been granted a 10-year lease for mining and crushing …

 — This Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 …

 — The case revolves around a constitutional petition challenging the legality of Rule 2(c) and Schedule-IV of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Power Crushers (Installation, Operation, and Regulations) …

 — 7. It is pointed out Rule 18 of the abovesaid Municipality Rules 2011 thereof deals with licenses to be issued to the stone crusher units and Rule 18(v) thereof stipulates that such license shall not be granted to a crusher unit which is situated within a distance of 500 metres from a State Highway or a National Highway.

 — He was hearing a petition challenging the vires of Rule 2(c) and Schedule-IV of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Power Crushers …

Karnataka High Court M/S Shree Maruthi Stone Crushers vs State Of Karnataka on 9 September, 2020 ... (2-A) of Rule 21 was incorporated with effect from 17.07.1997. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 21 providing for a period of 90 days was brought on the Rule Book with effect from 5th November, 2003 whereas, sub-rule (2A) of Rule 21, which suggests that ...

Supreme Court to deliver Verdict on Monday on Plea against Madras HC Ruling that Watching Child Porn not POCSO Offence; ... The Haryana Regulation and Control of Crushers Rules, 1992. ... showing the location of stone crusher with reference to National Highway, State Highway, town, abadi, approved urban area, colony, village Abadi and …

 — The Supreme Court on Monday directed the stone crushing plants in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa to stop their operations within two months, citing increase in …

 — He was hearing a petition challenging the vires of Rule 2(c) and Schedule-IV of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Power Crushers (Installation, Operation and Regulations) Rules, 2020 ("Rules") to the extent ...

Supreme Court of India M.C. Mehta Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others Etc. Etc on 15 May, 1992 Equivalent citations: 1991 SCR (1) 866, 1991 SCC (2) 353, AIRONLINE 1992 SC 254 ... The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no ...

 — Supreme Court of India State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017 SC (SUPP) 355, 2018 (14) SCC 537, (2017) 11 SCALE 651, 2017 (4) KLT SN 74 (SC) ... (hereinafter referred to as "1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed the …

The stone crushers should obtain consent to establish and consent to operate (CTO) from the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) before starting their operations. Stone …

12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon'ble the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph No.39 held thus:-"39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus reveals:

 — The Supreme Court has directed the closure of stone crushing plants in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa until they comply with environmental standards. KP EPA and …